Talk:Alejandra Caraballo/Archive 1

Controversies Section Deleted
KLEUSKE: First of, the section you added, gave WP:UNDUE weight to a tweet (which may have been wrong, but that does not constitute a "controversy"). Second, the tweets are, in all likelyhood, copyrighted. If not by the original author, then at least by twitter. 15:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

FACTS:

1- If a claim is spread to 80M people, reported by some newspapers and treated as fact while disproved by authorities, that's the definition of a conspiracy theory.

2- Public Twitter screenshots have no copyrights. They are public.

3- This page seems edited and safeguarded by Caraballo's supported. Nothing controversian is allowed.

You have removed important information related to this individual. ControversiesEditor (talk) 15:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Whether or not this is a "conspiracy theory" is not the point. The points are neutrality (in not lending undue weight to storms in a teacup) and copyright violations. Whoever the copyright holder may e, you tried to pass it off as "own work" o Commons, and issued a CC-by-SA license, which you cannot do. 15:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * P.S. For something to qualify as a "conspiracy theory". the theory needs to feature a conspiracy. Absent that, this is most certainly not one. Kleuske (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

2 January 2023
I will publish the real name of this public figure. Let's see how long it will take you to remove it. ControversiesEditor (talk) 15:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * See WP:DEADNAME to find out why you will likely be blocked over that. Kleuske (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Caraballo is a public figure. All public figures have their names added on wikipedia. Is she special? You are clearly protecting and safeguarding her page, removing anything of value that might paint her under a bad light.
 * You should not be part of Wikipedia. ControversiesEditor (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If a living transgender or non-binary person was not notable under a former name (a deadname), it should not be included in any page (including lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc.), even in quotations, even if reliable sourcing exists. Treat the pre-notability name as a privacy interest separate from (and often greater than) the person's current name. MOS:DEADNAME
 * Just FYI. I also note the second personal attack. Kleuske (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)