Talk:Aleksandr Maykov/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Kges1901 has written a number of Good Articles on the Soviet Union. This looks like another of high standard and I look forward to starting a review of it shortly. simongraham (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * The article is notable as evidenced by coverage in multiple sources.
 * The article is of reasonable length, with 1,490 words of readable prose.
 * The lead is a reasonable relative length at 155 words.
 * 99.4% of authorship is by Kges1901.
 * It is currently assessed as a B class article.
 * There is no evidence of edit wars.
 * It is consistent with the relevant Manuals of Style.
 * Earwig gives a 0.0% chance of copyright violation. This is extremely impressive.
 * The text seems clear and neutral.
 * Combine the first sentence in the lead with the remainder to create a single paragraph as per MOS:PARAGRAPH
 * Done


 * Consider adding a comma at the end of the subclause "In mid-1943" in the lead. Similarly after the subclauses "In November", " In early August", "In this capacity", "On the night of 1–2 November", and "In January 1948". Consider commas around the subclause "in April 1946". There may be other instances that I have missed.
 * Done
 * Amend to "where he served as a platoon and company commander".
 * Done


 * I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
 * Please remove the duplicate links to Moscow Military District and Order of Kutuzov.
 * Done


 * Add the translated title for Doluda.
 * Done


 * I see there are entries for Maykov in Soloviev's publications Commanders of Red Army divisions 1941-1945[] and Red Army Colonels. 1935-1945[] (both in Russian). I suggest adding one of these to the sources.
 * Those entries are copies of previously published information.


 * I will accept the off-line sources WP:AGF. Spotcheck of the online sources confirm they concern the subject.
 * Suggest including the exact page numbers where possible.
 * The infobox image seems appropriate and relevant but is of poor quality. Is there a better one available?
 * Unfortunately not


 * The image has an appropriate PD tag.

Excellent work. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 09:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Review
Thank you for your responses to the comments. I believe that this article now meets the criteria to be a Good Article. simongraham (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)