Talk:Alex Parrish/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

I'll put up comments soon. Numerounovedant  Talk  16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Looking at the rest. Numerounovedant  Talk  16:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Prose
 * You could avoid repetiton of American in the opening paragraph.
 * Same with FBI, I believe the the "FBI recruit" can simply be "recruit" as the mention of the "FBI Academy" makes it obvious.
 * "U.S intelligence"
 * I prefer "on and off relationship" as it is lest colloquial.
 * "as a completely white character" - completely seems to be an odd choice of words.
 * Not sure what a "talent holding deal" is.
 * "For her performance as Parrish" - odd phrasing, also, be consistent with use of "Alex" or "Parish" in the article.
 * Done. Krish &#124;  Talk  20:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The article could do without use a lot of trimming, as it has a lot of the lengthy direct quotes, in the production section in particular. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed few long quotes and trimmed others. Krish &#124;  Talk  02:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Some other concerns :
 * "talent holding deal" - not sure what this means.
 * "Apart from being the lead in an American series and working in Hollywood" - rather unnecessary.
 * "Having never auditioned in Bollywood" - same.
 * "that ABC was doing for the 2015–2016 television season" - doing a script?
 * "the show became all about her" - sound encyclopedia like at all?
 * "as a flawed human being who takes charge of her own life" - same.
 * "becoming the lead character" - repetitive.
 * "Alex is the focal point and the protagonist of the series" - I think the reader gets it by now.
 * For the reception section you might want to restructure the paragraphs, each of which could begin with a one line summary of what it talk about.


 * Done. Krish &#124;  Talk  02:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

I an sorry it took me s long, but this was the first thing I looked at on coming back. There are some obvious neutrality concerns, I hope you re-read it and make necessary changes to make it read more in a more encyclopedia-like fashion. Ping me if you have questions, but you want to go through te article once more. I will re-read once you're done addressing my comments. Numerounovedant  Talk  17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * You can take a look now. Krish &#124;  Talk  02:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

The article needs some cleanup and formatting fixes, but I'll take care of that. Other than that, it looks fine to me. Good job Krish!. It's a Pass. Numerounovedant  Talk  10:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Final Comments