Talk:Alex Waibel

Can this article reference the the details of Waibel's suit?
After reading the Wikimedia article on Waibel's lawsuit, I feel like it should be discussed in this article. Can we report the text of what was considered libelous, if it's presented in the clear context of explaining the lawsuit? Text like "Waibel’s research was used for mass analysis ­of recorded voice data by the American intelligence and military authorities" Andrew Keenan Richardson (talk!) 18:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Support. Benjamin (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * yes, but need to stick to the sources. i.e. that text is from a rotted link, so need to find alternate source. you are going to want to stick strictly to Biographies of living persons, given the high visibility. also, there is the primary source document from WMF to link to. Pinsnervy (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I see one person drove by to remove the information, without consensus. here is a paradox of "right to be forgotten": when your law firm maintains a page about it, then will you sue them? Too bad Germany does not have super-protect. Pinsnervy (talk) 18:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Support. At least a couple of sentences about this: https://thewikicabal.com/2019/01/20/waibel-v-wikimedia/ Zezen (talk) 06:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)