Talk:Alexander Nevzorov

POV check
This article, and especially the section about the "Nevzorov Haute Ecole", sounds more like a marketing statement. Statements like "[his] contribution to the development of Haute Ecole is really priceless" "He managed to do a seemingly impossible thing" etc. are points of view and barely qualify as facts. Plus, the article does not cite any sources. It also seems to me that the language used is partly beyond any comprehensibility, although that might be because I am not a native speaker. I find myself unable to improve this article. I would even suggest deleting it, unless somebody can turn this into a decent article. --80.145.93.181 03:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it looks like a marketing statement, but it is absolutely true. He was the first on the world to do Haute Ecole with a horse at complete liberty. It is a fact. --192.188.242.172 08:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

and there is no "marketing" behind NHE ,since the school is for free !

What does any of this have to do with the actual facts about A.G. Nevzorov? The entry is a marketing statement, unsupported by any sources. Nominated for deletion. -- Elements of Haute Ecole have been performed at liberty in circuses throughout the world for hundreds of years.

The entire statement on Nevzorov is en exercise in self-promotion. The content of the page is a near-perfect copy from Nevzorov website.

According to Nevzorov, his methods are built on complete trust between a horse and a rider. The methods have not been reviewed by an independent authority on the subject, cannot be verified, and, as all similar claims coming out of Russia should be viewed with skepticism.

Clearly, no one has actually researched this man and his school. Perhaps someone who is not involved with traditional equestrian sport should take a look. How can good information be posted in this entry if it is just going to be removed. This man's ideas are revolutionary, of course there is going to be skepticism, but why not allow the people who know these methods fill in the blanks. Don't condemn an entire idea because a certain group of people are ignorant? If these so-called horse experts are so brilliant, how come they haven't heard of this? Really, don't delete this information. Let it be added to, completed, by the people who know about Alexander and his amazing school.

~Annie

The entire entry is a promotional statement, nearly void of informational value. Very crude. The subject of the article is a person, A. Nevzorov. Promotion of his methods, whatever they may be, belongs in a business, educational brochure.

Nominated for deletion. Independent-2007 22:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I feel that the entry should NOT be deleted. If someone wants to add another perspective, they can add another section for their views. Perhaps someone wishes to add his voting history, controvetrial views, financial problems, etc. But viewers NEED to have an entry for school reports, etc. requiring Net Citaions. Also, his name is spelled Aleksandr. This is a letter by letter transliteration of a Proper Noun as required by English. -Aleksandr Kolesnikov Houston TX —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whiterussian1974 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

family line
Why does english page not mention his family like the russian page does? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.118.139 (talk) 01:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714111051/http://hauteecole.ru/en/alexander_nevzorov.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
A recent editor of this page appears to have a close personal connection to the subject of the article, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting request edit (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking where it says "click here" on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. You should provide full disclosure of your connection when using the talkpage, making an edit request and the like. Requested edits are subject to the same editorial standards as any other edit, and other editors may decline to act on them. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree, the only people editing this article seem to be those with COI issues. I wonder if there is any advantage to reworking this article so it is better quality?  Might stave off some of this?  (I also have to admit that I don't have doing so very high on my priority list...)   Montanabw (talk)  23:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexander Nevzorov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150704115510/http://celebirthday.narod.ru/startv6.htm to http://celebirthday.narod.ru/startv6.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Predicts invasion of Ukraine.
On verified personal Youtube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia8RFaeIqEk

With English subtitles:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OutvYSl_TLc

I suppose the verified channel probably works as a primary source from the guy himself, but I'm not finding any RS translations. A Russian speaker could cite it, though.

Intralexical (talk) 01:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Alexander Nevzorov says Putin’s actions amount to terrorism
Alexander Nevzorov has said that Russia’s actions in the besieged southern Ukrainian city of Mariupol amount to “terrorism”. “Is this liberation when we kill hundreds of civilians to liquidate a dozen soldiers?” Nevzorov wrote, adding that he would have to leave Russia after this post. See: (09:09 GMT) A notable Russian journalist accuses Moscow of “terrorism”: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/17/un-says-more-than-700-civilians-killed-ukraine-liveblog  123.205.19.162 (talk) 09:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)