Talk:Alexei Cherepanov/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Leech44 (talk · contribs) 16:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Good article review (see What is a good article? for criteria)

The page is in good shape and already there were just a few things that I came across while reading this, which I will point out below.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC) In the playing career section.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

a. For his play the previous season, Cherepanov was named RSL Newcomer of the Year for the '06-'07 Season.
 * This seems odd, the previous season notation doesn't seem to fit. the year is mentioned and the sentence follows discussion of said season. I think that it can just be dropped.
 * Done. I think this was a previously written sentence that I left intact after checking the content of the reference.
 * Why is the year notation for the award different from all of the other years?
 * Fixed.

b. NHL is first spelled out as part of the Draft so the first stand alone use of NHL should be linked similar to what you've done with the KHL.
 * Found it and fixed.

c. Like wise the first mention of KHL should be fully written out as part of the season listing.
 * This one took longer to track down, but I found it and fixed it.

In the International play section

a.  He was particularly effective in the 3rd place game against the United States, recording 3 points during a 4–2 victory over the United States
 * No need to say United States twice.
 * Yep, that sounded weird, and it now fixed.
 * For the link, United States Country is liked, would a link to United States men's national junior ice hockey team be better like how Russia is linked?
 * Fixed.

In the Playing style section

a. In the first sentence you reference him as a "forward, who had a special talent for scoring goals" then three sentence later it is stated again as part of a quote. The first mention should be changed to something along the lines of noted goal scorer, goal scoring offensive forward, offensive forward with a knack for scoring goals or similar. A change should be made to keep the repetition out.
 * Reorganized.

a. A spot check of the References shows not copyright violations.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):

b. For reference # 22 The New York Times should be italicized like in the other mentions of the paper.


 * Fixed.

c. Linking should consistent. #9 The New York Times is linked # 8 New York Rangers are link, while #15 The Globe and Mail and #31 Colorado Avalanche are not. All with pages should be linke or none of them should be linked.
 * Removed it from all.

d. Use of TSN should be consistent as well - TSN.ca (#19) and TSN (#25)
 * Fixed this.

No images included on the page. Maybe consider adding a fair use image for a deceased individual, something like Bobby Bauer.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I am chasing down a few avenues to get some existing images released under an appropriate license. I am going to hold off going through the fair use route until I know for sure those won't pan out.
 * It's not a big deal if you can't find one. I feel it adds to a page if you can put a face to the name and with such limited access to North America and such a short playing career there would seem to be less chance of a free licensed image. That coupled with his death would seem to make it a candidate for Fair Use.


 * 1) Overall:
 * Only a few things that need to be taken care of.
 * Everything that needed to be address to meet GA has been fixed. I am happy to pass this. Good work.
 * I think this is everything. Thanks for the review, and let me know if I missed anything that needed to be addressed!  Canada Hky (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think this is everything. Thanks for the review, and let me know if I missed anything that needed to be addressed!  Canada Hky (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Pass/Fail: