Talk:Alicia Witt

photos
Photos would be helpful on this article. KarateLadyKarateLady 01:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

prodigial child
A child prodigy, "Alicia, possibly started reading at the age of six-and-a-half, seven months" - Is this a hoax? Don't get me wrong, I am a huge fan, but I have never heard of a child that does not read at six years of age, unless traumatic or exceptional social circumstances have prevented this pretty normal developement. A "child prodigy" would be able to read at age three or four. This sentence is completely superfluous and I guess it has to be a result of vandalism/pranksters. -- 85.181.158.233 (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The answer is in the very text you quoted. 6-7 months, not years. Elizium23 (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Personal life
Alicia Witt has never been married. She is currently dating Ben Folds of Ben Folds Five. 211.28.145.148 (talk) 14:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

http://www.news.com.au/national/singer-songwriter-ben-folds-finds-love-with-us-actor-alicia-witt/story-fndo4dzn-1226517668898 http://www.thesuburbs.org.uk/Board/index.php?topic=6700.0`` ` Alicia recently had her first gig in Australia in November and subsequently holidayed with him, and they have appeared at a lot of gigs together.211.28.145.148 (talk) 14:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Some editors delete personal information even it is verifiable, they also insist it must be shown to also be WP:NOTABLE

Complete absence of music information
…does a disservice to the subject, and to the encyclopedic claims of this venue. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Extensive re-edit
…to create sections for theatre and music aspects of career, and for personal information (currently, limited to a statement already appearing at the Ben Fields article). As well, the very poor state of the sourcing of the article is noted, which is a serious issue for a BLP article. Please do not remove tags without cleaning up the bare URLs, and sourcing the vast tracts of career information that is currently unverifiable via non-publicity, non-IMDB (i.e., independent, encyclopedic) sources. Le Prof 71.239.87.100 (talk) 07:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * New reference 13 is offered as an example of what complete citations may look like (where, in the case that the URL becomes obsolete, the citation is not useless in tracing the original information). 71.239.87.100 (talk) 07:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)