Talk:Alisia Dragoon

Fair use rationale for Image:Alisia Dragoon.jpg
Image:Alisia Dragoon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Gender Bias
I feel that the language should be changed in the section about the game challenging gender bias, as I can't say that Alisia was one of the "first" games to offer a female protagonist. Frankly I'm not sure the paragraph is even necessary, but I don't actually know if this game has notability in those circles. At any rate, there are a great deal of games that predate it in this, such as Metroid, The Guardian Legend, Ghost Lion, Mario 2, Krion Conquest, The Valis series, Time Gal, etc. Alisia is a fantastic game but was nowhere near the first to feature a female main character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.85.180.40 (talk) 00:19, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh. Many parts of the article read like the homework of a gender studies college student trying really hard to subdue their rage over things that happened more than twenty years ago and have no effect in their lives whatsoever, but what are you going to do? Those kind of people have the time to waste on keeping these articles unchanged from their biased liking. 177.245.214.222 (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree. I've changed it. Tezero (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)