Talk:Alison King

Image
Can we please find or create a good, free image of her head that can be used with the biography information? There have been a few images of her uploaded that have all been taken down over disputes about fair use. The article needs an image to show what she looks like. Poeheese (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality of information
It feels like the biography information on the right hand side reads more like a CV than most other pages, why does it need agent information or employer history? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.49.56.28 (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

'Recently'
I have just removed all instances of the devil-word 'recently' from this article, after stumbling on it by accident. It doesn't take that long before 'recently' becomes old. Try to avoid using 'recently' whenever possible. BenC533 01:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Carla corrie.jpg
The image Image:Carla corrie.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --05:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Daughter's name
I've had to remove the name a few times now, so could it stop being added without a source please? It's now been written as Sarah Louise and Daisy, so we need a source before this can be added to the article. Thanks. Sky83 (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

re "Face of Boddingtons Beer" was this not Melanie Sykes about 1995 ?
re "Face of Boddingtons Beer" was this not Melanie Sykes about 1995 ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.72.202 (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Revert of sock puppetry
This is regarding this large revert. This was mostly a revert of edits made by Poeheese, who has been blocked as a sock per Sockpuppet investigations/AnimationWhiz133 (archive). There may have been some good edits that got lost in the mix, but I think most of the changes made by other editors were minor fixes of content added by the sock puppet. Many of the sources added did not appear reliable, or were clearly unreliable tabloids/gossip sites, and the level of detail is entirely inappropriate. There are still some source issues, but adding more tabloids is only making things worse.

If anyone (other than AnimationWhiz133) feels my edit unacceptably damaged the article, please feel free to revert, but please also carefully review the added content to make sure it's WP:DUE and supported by WP:RS. Thanks. Grayfell (talk)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alison King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202175417/http://www.cam.co.uk/actresses/alison-king/ to http://www.cam.co.uk/actresses/alison-king/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302144145/http://www.itv.com/Soaps/coronationstreet/newsandgossip/Babynames765/default.html to http://www.itv.com/Soaps/coronationstreet/newsandgossip/Babynames765/default.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)