Talk:All God's Children Need Traveling Shoes/Archives/2014/June

To do
First off, well done! What a great expansion! A couple suggestions before next step (peer review? GA nomination?):
 * Thanks, AB! I usually like to let an article sit for at least a couple of weeks after expanding/writing it.  The next step is DYK; it's been nominated, but hasn't been assigned a date yet.  Then GAN is next, I think.

-- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * endashes for page ranges ✅
 * "cite book" template for Citations section
 * "Harvard citation no brackets" template for references
 * I'm not as familiar with these kinds of sourcing methodologies. My method provides the same results when you look at the end result of an article, and for me, it's simpler.  But if you want to give me a tutorial on it (or even make the change yourself), I'm open to it.
 * Here is one example, if you are interested in seeing how the template can be used. You'll notice that under the Specific references, a reader can click on an author's last name and it jumps to the appropriate source in the Works Cited section. This is certainly not required, just something I appreciate and thought it might be potentially useful here. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * linking in references (news sources, journals, etc.)
 * Are you talking about putting double brackets around, for example, The New York Times in ref 66? If so, I've never seen the need for doing it in reference sections.  If a reviewer tells me I should, though, I will.  And I won't revert the edits of another editor who chooses to do so.
 * No worries. Often sources are linked, though I have also had requests to remove linking for sources, especially for internationally renowned sources like The New York Times. Depends on the reviewers, I suppose. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * other categories?
 * Again, I will feign ignorance to mask my laziness. My practice is to allow other editors to take of this for me, since I'm not knowledgeable about cats.  I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, like this article, has 5 cats and it's a FA. Christine (talk) 11:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Figureskatingfan, please do not take any of the above as criticism but rather notes/reminders to myself. None of the above is required (as far as I know), but I appreciate that you are open to the suggestions, especially if requested in the review process. I am not sure of any additional categories to add either, though perhaps another read through the article would offer suggestions (I added the Ghana category yesterday). -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Was I being defensive?! ;) I appreciate your feedback, I really do. I think I'm going to wait and see what reviewers  tell me about linking within refs (I've never had anyone tell me I should do it, though) and continue to be lazy about cats.  If something comes to me re: cats, I'll add them.  I kinda lean toward those that say that there's too much categorization in this project, anyway.  I'm gonna try out the Harvard citation template; I'm always open to improving the way I do refs and you're right about making the ref section easier for readers.  I loved your example!  I saw it and went, "Why isn't it an FL!"  Then I read the discussion page and FLC are found out why, you poor thing. ;) Christine (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)