Talk:All Hands and Hearts

Pre-existing draft
There's a draft about this topic at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/All Hands Volunteers. The material is substantially different. Is there content in the draft that should be added to the mainspace article? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 03:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on All Hands Volunteers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140329065639/http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/se_winners.htm to http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/se_winners.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 4 June 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Please feel free to reinitiate discussion if the issues raised below have been addressed. Dekimasu よ! 20:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

All Hands Volunteers → All Hands And Hearts - Smart Response – All Hands Volunteers has merged with the Happy Hearts Fund to become All Hands and Hearts. To update the Wikipedia page to be relevant, the name and logo must be updated. Gwjanes (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC) -->


 * Oppose. First update the article adding the recent history involving All Hands And Hearts - Smart Response, to which that title can redirect. Then we can see whether it's warranted to move and refocus this article, or whether a split is more appropriate. Or if confident two articles are justified, start a new article on the new organisation. At present the article deals almost entirely with the organisation up until the merge. Andrewa (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Recent edits
I've undertaken cuts to marketing speak and promotional edits that appear to arise from a conflict of interest. Editors who are adding promotion and exhaustively self-sourced material must declare any conflicts of interest and abide by best practices for editors with a COI. In particular, please note that this is an encyclopedia article that must adhere to Wikipedia's standards for non-promotion and independent sourcing - it isn't an extension of the organization's web presence. The article needs extensive restructuring to present a concise, neutrally worded encyclopedic account of the organization and its activities, and should not contain blow-by-blow accounts of everything AHAH has ever done, nor does it need to describe weather events that are better covered elsewhere on Wikipedia - that's why we have internal links. Most of all, the tone should not sound like a public relations office release, and it will require extensive work to recast this as a sober encyclopedia article. This kind of thing is why we require COI editors to declare themselves.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

If the most recent editor can make the appropriate declarations, I think the best course is to cut back to a basic text and, with guidance, rebuild the detail in more concise and less glowing prose, rather than year-by-year or event-by-event lists.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 22 December 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Number  5  7  23:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

All Hands And Hearts - Smart Response → All Hands And Hearts – The branding seems to be consistently "All Hands And Hearts." The longer name is used in one place on the web site - Our Story. I would have just moved this without discussion but I saw the previous discussion ending in "no consensus." That move was done a few months later. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  00:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.