Talk:All That Matters (Justin Bieber song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 03:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * great job at using citations multiple times
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image used in the background and conception section is a picture of Bieber, but the caption is talking about Poo Bear. That information should've been given in the section, not in the comment of the image, which mind you, has nothing to do with the picture.
 * I have now altered the caption to summarize the description provided by Bieber more, if this works? --K. Peake 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image used in the background and conception section is a picture of Bieber, but the caption is talking about Poo Bear. That information should've been given in the section, not in the comment of the image, which mind you, has nothing to do with the picture.
 * I have now altered the caption to summarize the description provided by Bieber more, if this works? --K. Peake 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image used in the background and conception section is a picture of Bieber, but the caption is talking about Poo Bear. That information should've been given in the section, not in the comment of the image, which mind you, has nothing to do with the picture.
 * I have now altered the caption to summarize the description provided by Bieber more, if this works? --K. Peake 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image used in the background and conception section is a picture of Bieber, but the caption is talking about Poo Bear. That information should've been given in the section, not in the comment of the image, which mind you, has nothing to do with the picture.
 * I have now altered the caption to summarize the description provided by Bieber more, if this works? --K. Peake 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The image used in the background and conception section is a picture of Bieber, but the caption is talking about Poo Bear. That information should've been given in the section, not in the comment of the image, which mind you, has nothing to do with the picture.
 * I have now altered the caption to summarize the description provided by Bieber more, if this works? --K. Peake 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * I feel as this article has maxed out pretty much everything you can do in an article about a song, but I did find a few areas for improvement, which I am going to leave below. Once these are fixed, this article will be good to go!
 * Lead: 1st paragraph -
 * Lead: 1st paragraph -
 * Lead: 1st paragraph -
 * I have re-worded the quotation and moved the last sentence to the second para where it is more relevant. --K. Peake 06:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)