Talk:Allegheny Technologies

Pit Project Assessmet
Rated article as a stub, gave mid rating of importance. Usually save High ratings for fortune 500 companies (almost there).PadreNuestro 02:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Pollution Record
In regards to the pollution information i've been looking at the links. The one regarding the pollution around schools makes me a bit curious. The website linked doesn't report the findings of the area(s) before the industrial environment in question existed. So im not sure how the findings can say that a particular company is responsible for the 'pollution' if they don't cite air readings prior to any industrial activity in the area.

Im removing the "pollution" title since I just looked up the top 5 polluters in reference to the toxic 100 list and none of those companies have "pollution" as a title. There also appears to be a negative slant towards companies such as this that aren't in the top of the list because the actions they take to correct potential problems isn't going to be as well known as a top 5er.

The environmental records of the top 5 usually also show positive environmental actions which for companies not in the top 5 may not be well publicized since the movement in this day in age is to attack any industry until we have none. Woods01 (talk) 05:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Mixed up history
Pompton Furnace was not in Pittsburgh. Article needs history of both predecessor companies explained- "their" steel is not clear.208.105.148.234 (talk) 04:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)