Talk:Allegiant Air/Archive 1

Full protection
This article has been protected for three days to stop the edit war. Please try to get a discussion of the content going here on the talk page of the article, rather than in edit summaries or user talk pages. Best wishes, -- Dianna (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * What exactly is the argument here anyway? The press release says that there is an "intention to acquire" (not sure if this means anything in particular but that is indeed what it says) and it says very clearly that "No additional MD-80 retirements are planned as a result of this transaction." Simishag (talk) 07:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * An "intention to acquire" means that the airline plans to acquire some Airbus A320 aircraft (according to the press release) but I believe this is not confirmed yet. It is the arguement between two editors one readding it saying the airline will get the aircraft and the other saying the airline will not. The information is already mentioned in prose but cannot be added to the table until a it is firm. This is similar to airlines applying for new routes but have not given approval to do so yet. Snoozlepet (talk) 17:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I am one of the two users that was part of this "edit war". To get the the point, this was not about the "intention to acquire" part. That was solved before the "edit war" started. We came the the conclusion that you cannot add the A320's to the fleet because it was not an actual purchase but just an intention. In the fleet section, the last paragraph discusses the intention to acquire the A320's. The problem arose when the user AerospaceAirAviation put at the end of that paragraph "The airline will eventually retire MD-80 series aircraft" or something along the lines of that. In a press release from Allegiant from when they announced their purchase of the A319's, on page 13, you will see them state VERY clearly that there is "No firm plans at this time to retire more MD-80s". From the press release regarding the intention to acquire the A320's, it also CLEARLY states that "No additional MD-80 retirements are planned as a result of this transaction". So, unless I am reading wrong, the airline will NOT be retiring any MD-80's (besides 2 MD-87's) from the fleet anytime soon and there is no need to write "The airline will eventually retire MD-80 series aircraft". I would appreciate any feed back on this. Thanks! - DONALDderosa (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Notes:
 * The first press release. http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ALGT/1995942847x0x586655/1aa26d06-cf31-4182-b92a-cb8462d3c8db/Allegiant%20Travel%20Company%20Aircraft%20Presentation%20-Jul%202012.pdf
 * The second press release. http://ir.allegiantair.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=727967

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Allegiant Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121016092518/http://www.ocregister.com/articles/airport-232952-long-airlines.html to http://www.ocregister.com/articles/airport-232952-long-airlines.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 07:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)