Talk:Allen Tannenbaum

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Allen Tannenbaum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120929005738/http://cse.umn.edu/aboutcse/facultyawards/CSE_CONTENT_289850.php to http://cse.umn.edu/aboutcse/facultyawards/CSE_CONTENT_289850.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Controversies
I have started a discussion thread at WP:BLPN re the controversies section and its attempted repeated removal. Please see Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I have reworded the section a bit and added an extra source. Hopefully when the block of the editor who was unhappy with this section expires, they will participate in this discussion thread instead of continuing to edit war. Nsk92 (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, Joseph Deasy here. Following Dr. Tannenbaum's death, I updated the Wikipedia page.  I also reviewed the controversy section and this controversy thread.  I believe the section is not consistent with Wikipedia standards for the following reasons:
 * 1. The story is not well-sourced. There are two mentions from the web-page of a local area news provide in Atlanta.  However, they are sparse on details and the audit report mentioned is completely un-sourced.  There is not quote from the Technion.
 * 2. The story sounds highly unethical, and basically claims the Tannenbaums may have criminally defrauded Ga Tech for up to $2M. However, despite the allegations, this was completely disputed by the Tannenbaum's attorney; no charges were brought; and some kind of settlement was reached for a much smaller amount.
 * 3. If Ga Tech was correct, it is not clear why charges were not brought.
 * 4. Dr. Tannenbaum is not a public person according to Wikipedia criteria.
 * 5. Not only were there no charges, but there was no conviction.
 * 6. The Ga. Tech claims then fall under the category of unproved accusations against a private person.
 * 7. Lastly, this incident has no clear importance in the overall context of Dr. Tannenbaum's life.
 * For these reasons, I deleted the section. Joseph O Deasy (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)