Talk:Allophonic rule

the example rule
The example rule was stated wrong: it used to assert that /tl/ > [ʔl] but /tn/ > [ɾn], wrong on both counts. "Bottom" "bottle" "butter" have the [ʔ], "button" has the [ɾ]. This is kind of unfortunate, 'cause it makes the rule harder to state nicely symbolically: /l m ɹ/ as against /n/ aren't particularly a natural class. So I've taken the symbolic rule out, but perhaps we should just replace the example. 4pq1injbok (talk) 08:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC) Geh, I got my precedes and my follows confused. Never mind me. Although I guess it's worth pointing out that I don't think I've heard [nt] > [nɾ] either; rather I'm familiar with [nt] either staying or resolving to [n] or [~ɾ]. 4pq1injbok (talk) 07:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

redirect?
The content of this article is discussed at length in the article for phonological rule. I suggest it should be redirected to that page. Hauserivy (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)