Talk:Aloe harlana

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because it is a start of an article --Cs california (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) This is a legitamate plant perSan Marcos growers, IUCN and wikidata (Q769770)
 * 2) there is a german wikipedia article on the plant with more information
 * 3) See taxon identifiers for additional references.


 * Of course it shouldn't be deleted; articles about species are inherently notable, and often start as stubs. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)