Talk:Alphonse Areola/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   20:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead will need to be expanded in order to summarise the article per WP:LEAD. Given the size of the article, I would recommend expanding to a decent sized paragraph (a few sentences more should do it)
 * "Areola began playing football at the age of 6 for Petits Anges and spent seven years at his local club before signing for PSG" - what does PSG stand for? Some clarification is needed
 * "Areola played 61 minutes in the final match of the season before being substituted for fourth-choice 'keeper Ronan Le Crom" - stray apostrophe?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

The lead will need to be expanded slightly, but overall I think this is a close to meeting the criteria as it is comprehensive and well researched for the subject. On hold  JAG  UAR   15:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Edits
Hi JAG, thank you for reviewing this nomination. It is greatly appreciated. I have made the following changes as per your recommendations.


 * I have extended the lead by adding two further sentences.
 * I have changed 'PSG' to 'Paris Saint-Germain' in the opening line under Paris Saint-Germain and included further reference to the league they play in.
 * The apostrophe in 'keeper is included as a result of the shortening of the word goalkeeper. I have seen it written without the apostrophe though so I'm not too bothered by that. If you'd like me to remove I shall do so.

Thanks again for the review.

Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the responses! Don't worry about the apostrophe, it seems minor. Anyway, with all of the issues addressed this looks good to go.  JAG  UAR   18:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)