Talk:Alternatives to the Ten Commandments

Purpose of the Ten Commandments
The ten commandments were generally designed for the survival and betterment of the community (as opposed to personal perspectives). The breaking of a commandment by an individual was bad for the group (e.g. it was thought that warship of multiple gods as well as atheism splinters society). Notice that "thou shall not rape" or "though shall not torture" are not a commandments - because this [arguably] deals more with personal rights and freedoms than with preservation of the group. Most alternatives in the article are naive to this fundamental principal. Furthermore, "don't do to others what you wouldn't want done to you" and "love your neighbor" are general principle of every major religion on the planet, but are too abstract to be commandments. Authors need to understand the purpose of the commandments before blathering on about alternatives. Personally I would like to see "thou shall not pollute" added to the list of commandments, along with some other revisions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.69.77 (talk) 04:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Three Laws of Robotics
No mention of the Three Laws of Robotics which seems to have expanded to 6 or so laws, that more or less work for humans?
 * Yeah, I think they should at least be referenced. I may do that in a bit. Foomandoonian (talk) 00:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Ted Kazinsky (sic)? Really?
Do we really need to include a section on the code of conduct of a terrorist & serial killer? Don't his actions invalidate his standing as a person entitled to discuss ethical social behavior? Wouldn't it be better to just ignore such a person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.47.171 (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Kaczynski's own article mentions that a number of his fellow anarcho-primitivists have actually defended him and his manifesto, if not his actions. So despite being a terrorist, his ideology has been influential among some. Consider that we also have an article about the Ladenese epistles, which were also written by a (far more notorious) terrorist. LonelyBoy2012 (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

It's pretty clear that Kaczynski's screed and the off-the-cuff other ones are intentionally included to make the true alternatives appear less worthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.163.71.116 (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Organization? Themes?
This page is incoherent. It could use an introduction and some effort at organizing the lists in some way. The lists could use a little context as well; for instance, George Carlin's list was meant to get laughs, while Selig Starr’s was directed at furture Orthodox Jewish rabbis and is (I assume) a supplement rather than an "alternative" to the Ten Commandments.

At least we could arrange the lists chronologically. I can't think of any good reason why the first place in the article should go to a Las Vegas stage magician. As it stands, it makes the whole article seem frivolous. — ℜ ob C. alias ALAROB 17:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Good suggestion. I arranged the list in chronological order according to the year of publication.Andy3334 (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Pastafarianism
I find the inclusion of this really objectionable. It's a joke, right. It's a long running joke, part of which is that the jokers pretend they are serious, but still, it's a send up. Like the Church of Bob and the Illuminatus Trilogy. Here we are working towards a encyclopedic article on a topic and it's like a Monty Python script has been inserted in the middle. I agree with the above poster who said that it seems like some of these have been added to rubbish the topic with their inclusion. There may be a case of the Unabomber, he and those who agree with him are at least sincere. His manifesto was dead-serious, not an elaborate inside joke. Let's improve this article and delete Pastafarianism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.76.12 (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)