Talk:Amabilis uchoensis

Category
Hi @HouseOfChange. According to Template:Taxonomy/Amabilis, family Podocnemididae is not found in the taxonomy of this species at all. Perhaps the taxonomy template is wrong, or perhaps we are getting it confused with the (spelled almost exactly the same) clade Podocnemidoidae (note the extra "o")? Podocnemidoidae (with an "o" at the end) is found in the taxonomy of this, but does not have its own category, therefore I believe the most specific cat is probably Category:Pleurodira. Thoughts? – Novem Linguae (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your civil enquiry. My edit was an error. My original reason for creating this article was that it was an interesting-looking redlink in the article about that family "Podocnemididae." But Hermanson 2020 clearly assigns it to the Podocnemedoidae and not Podocnemididae. Perhaps our article Podocnemididae needs to be corrected on this count. I will revert my revert, and thanks for calling the error to my attention. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me! Thanks for the response. See you around :) – Novem Linguae (talk) 00:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)