Talk:Amani al-Khatahtbeh

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 13 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Meeraoaldhaheri.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Website
MuslimGirl.com is the website of Amani Al-Khatahtbeh. See here. gobonobo + c 05:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amani Al-Khatahtbeh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161024085011/http://www.kitv.com/story/33416656/muslimgirlcom-founder-on-islamophobia-and-the-election to http://www.kitv.com/story/33416656/muslimgirlcom-founder-on-islamophobia-and-the-election

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

thanks
thank you tweet Victuallers (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Sourcing issues.
Some sources in the controversy section are not reliable and seem to go against WP:BLP and other policies. So in the controversy section we have the bold but poorly sourced claim that Amani endorses 9/11 conspiracy theories. It's source is a youtube video by Amani herself which is spoken word poetry. The source itself is not a reliable one and it doesn't make the definitive claim that Amani endorses a conspiracy theory other than what someone analyzed and interpreted from the video. These statements might be against WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY which states that Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so. Whoever placed that text analyzed and interpreted a primary source themselves but added no reliable secondary source then made a claim (essentially original research). The way the claim is written and sourced right now is irresponsible at best even if it's true. The next issue is that of a source claiming that Muslimgirl.com/Amani plagiarizes. The source is a duo's personal website/blog. Sources like this can't stand as a reliable source for claims especially for a BLP page. I'm planning to remove the claims of plagiarism and of the 9/11 conspiracy theory endorsement as the sources and uncritical leveling of claims is not acceptable as it stands. The information might be placed in the future if it fulfils the criteria like the rest of the section, which is properly sourced, written and attributed. --SlackingViceroy (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)