Talk:Amanita ravenelii

Taxonomy
This section really leaves to be desired. I tried to make the prose more legible,but that is a challenge I can't quite figure out what half the described characters mean. Not to mention I'm not sure describing the features of the section in such details is really pertinent. This content probably best belongs to an infrageneric taxon page or possibly to a page such as Taxonomy of Amanita, though List of Amanita species is a potential target too. Also, the section ought to mention on or two species considered close relatives to A. ravenelii. Circéus (talk) 17:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's equally confusing as written in Singer 1986. I removed it. Someday I'll work on the main Amanita article (or one of the other two you suggested) and overhaul all the species pages (or maybe someone else who actually knows this stuff will do it first...) Sasata (talk) 18:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * As it is, I don't really think there's a need to add that info in species articles in general (unless it's relevant to explain changes in taxonomy). Circéus (talk) 12:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)