Talk:Amaryllidaceae

See Talk:Amaryllidoideae for earlier discussion. Largely deleted due to copywrite violations in the Spanish version on which it was based. Needs completely rewriting! Note Spanish is GA and therefore worth revisiting--Michael Goodyear (talk) 16:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


 * It may have been declared GA by that wikiproject, but it has material basically translated from English sources which aren't acceptable here. So "revisiting" has to mean using its material as a source for paraphrasing. Peter coxhead (talk) 02:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Exactly - my usual approach! --Michael Goodyear (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Mothballing cladogram
The original was too complex, so placed here for reference - preferring subcladograms --Michael Goodyear (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Strategy
After a lot of work on this page, and considerable reflection, I think it will work best as a sunnary page concentrating on the similarities and differences between the three subfamilies with the details mainly left to the subfamily pages --Michael Goodyear (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree. It's not clear that this family will survive; specialists seem to be continuing to use Alliaceae and Amaryllidaceae s.s. in recent papers. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)