Talk:Amateur Station Operator's Certificate/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Intro
Hey there! I'm weebiloobil, and I'm here to assess your article. Having noticed that you've had a previous, recent GA Review, I may take some of the comments made there into consideration. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Or if you fancy a chat. Good luck! - weebiloobil (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) =Nichalp   «Talk»=  15:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

The Review
This is usually the bit where I go rabbiting on about how you have 7 days to improve the article, you need to do this and that, this image needs fixing, etc. However, this article - and I can't remember the last time this happened to me - has passes without any need to go on hold. The only issue I found was a double full stop, which I corrected myself. Other than that, the article is great, definitely GA status. Well done! - weebiloobil (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I guess it must because I do not believe in GA, preferring to go straight for FAs. I was aiming for a Featured Topic and I still need to research to get this to FA status. I've never got a GA, so thought why not try get at least one? =Nichalp   «Talk»=  15:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That's the spirit! - weebiloobil (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * :) My FA:GA ratio is now 17:1. What need to be mentioned is that I copy-pasted parts of the featured article Amateur radio in India to fill in some content here. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  15:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Does nee matter. Good luck with more FAs - weebiloobil (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)