Talk:Amazing Stories (1985 TV series)

Reasons for lack of commercial success?
The article currently states (with a "citation needed" tag) that the lack of a regular host contributed to its downfall. My own thoughts on this are that the theme and tone of the shows varied too widely to capture a consistent audience. The title sequence shows Spielberg's intent for the show of three generations of a family watching TV together, but while the show over its entire course would please everyone, this would rarely occur within each episode. Watching them again recently on DVD, I was rather struck by the contrast between the noirish, graphically violent "The Amazing Falsworth" about a stage psychic who discovers a serial killer in his audience (one of the best written, acted, and directed eps in the series, btw), and the innocent and childish "Fine Tuning" about aliens liking American TV, which aired the following week. I'm not trying to write a review here, more to set forth a hypothesis: I think if we dug enough we'd find critics discussing this issue of inconsistency, and opining on the inability of parents to know from one week to the next if the kids will be enthralled, bored, or would have to be sent to the next room depending on what the subject matter of the episode was. Thoughts? Anyone see any commentary along these lines? Or is there established commentary on the difficulty of maintaining an anthology television series in general? Postdlf 15:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

there's a wikipedia article about the number 23--some folks think it's a mystical number. i heard that the episode "the mission" specifies a bit of fighter-plane lore that no plane has (at least, perhaps, at that time) survived more than 22 combat flights. the fateful mission in that episode was flight #23. can anyone verify and cross link? 23rdians love this sort of stuff. 76.202.249.19 (talk) 17:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * i remember this show as a kid, great program —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.47.16.42 (talk) 00:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Amazingstoriescap.gif
Image:Amazingstoriescap.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

There was a couple of Laserdiscs released with selected episodes as well, but I cannot tell you when or what episodes. I think there were two discs, I have one of them. If someone knows more about this, it would be good info to have. I don't want to add information without specifics.

151.148.122.100 (talk) 22:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Reception section
While I agree with you that without a source expressly saying so, the claim that "most" reviews were positive is not verified, you then proceeded to remove the ones that were not, as with this edit, when obviously those were originally included to show that not all reviews were positive and those citations were only out of place after you yourself changed the text. Negative reviews obviously should be referenced in this article as well, so please preserve those references but with appropriate prose. postdlf (talk) 17:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Amazing Stories (TV series)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Amazing Stories (TV series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "emmys": From Christopher Lloyd:  From Netflix:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:47, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Amazing Stories (1985 TV series)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Amazing Stories (1985 TV series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "PBS": From Jeff Jarvis:  From Jon Cryer:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)