Talk:Ambidirectional dominance

Merge
There is no reason for this not to be merged with the dominance article. The creator of this article has advocated against having a separate article for 'autosomal dominance' yet has this self promoting article on ambidirectional dominance. UberMD (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This article is currently certainly short enough to be merged into Dominance (genetics). However, as it deals with a polygenic situation, whereas the dominance article deals with the single gene situation, this might get a bit confusing. --Crusio (talk) 21:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge proposal withdrawn, see discussion at Dominance (genetics). --Crusio (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)