Talk:Ambiophonics

Nofootnotes tag and cleanup
Regarding the nofootnotes tag, I noticed the list of references at the bottom, but they need to be properly cited within the article itself. See WP:CIT for the appropriate templates to use. For cleanup, I think there's too much technical jargon in this article. It seems like the intended audience for this article is too specific. Sjsharktank (talk) 09:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Somebody had cited the references inline, but in a non-standard way. I wikified these. Note that the last reference was not cited inline, so I simply left in at the bottom of the References section. That needs to be tidied up. I also converted three inline external links to s. These need to be changed from bare URLs; cite web would be good for this. HairyWombat 18:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Ad copy
This reads like ad copy. It should tell us how Ambiophonics works. Odradek5 (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Proper noun
Is "ambiophonics" a proper noun? This article is inconsistent on whether it is capitalized when not at the beginning of a sentence. —  void  xor  00:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)