Talk:Ambondro mahabo

Genus
Please note that the researchers who named Ambondro mahabo explicitly rejected Linnaean taxonomy in their paper and did not intend Ambondro to be a genus name, but part of a two-part species name. This shouldn't much affect the text but referring to Ambondro without using the formation Ambondro mahabo or A. mahabo is incorrect. MMartyniuk (talk) 14:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Regardless of the intent of the original describers (which is not made explicit in the paper), it is common in the secondary literature to refer to this animal by its generic name (see e.g. Google Scholar), and I see no reason why this article cannot follow that convention.
 * I've also reverted your introduction of an automatic taxobox. The automatic taxobox did not italicize the scientific name of this animal, and it does not have the question mark next to Australosphenida, which I think is essential for making this article neutral. Ucucha (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Ambondro lingual.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Ambondro lingual.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 13, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-05-13. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! — howcheng  {chat} 20:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)