Talk:Ambrose Dudley, 3rd Earl of Warwick/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: found and fixed two. Also fixed two broken ref links in the references section. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose is reasonably well written. I would suggest that if you wish to take this further, to WP:FAC, you brush it up to become excellently well written. Some of the sentences verge on the over-long, they might be better broken up and made plainer.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * On-line sources check out. Assume good faith for off-line, all appear reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Appropriately used, tagged and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Fine. I find that this article satisfactorily meets the GA criteria. The prose could be improved but it is "reasonably well written". Passing as GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Fine. I find that this article satisfactorily meets the GA criteria. The prose could be improved but it is "reasonably well written". Passing as GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! Buchraeumer (talk) 21:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! - PKM (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)