Talk:Ambrosini SAI.207

575kmh or 630kmh speed? However, pilots weren't so happuy as the agility of this fighter, nor the structure, better for a racer aircraft, was satisfactory as well.--80.104.204.98 09:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Who knows? Moreover, the S.403 was even more controvertial: how can be faster than S.207 with the same engine and 200 kg more, not to talk about aerodynamic, less versed in speed and more as agility (bigger wings, more drag)? There are values of 650 kmh, simply out of the realm of reality, but also 560 km/h, well more reliable but still, a bit low to justify the entusiam and order 3000 machines. In every cases, something is not clear. I don't think that S.207 was faster than C.202 or S.403 to C.205, that had twice hp.--Stefanomencarelli 20:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

575 km/h is the right i've a pdf copy of RA document, 575 km/h at 5.5 km high, the planes was slow in climb 7' and 34" for 6 km, and this datas are for a prototype, they are sure a bit badest for pre production planes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.49.239.26 (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Re-write
I have re-written this article but only had limited references, relying on the original article. I would appreciate it if anybody could add referencces.Petebutt (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)