Talk:Amedei Porcelana

Spam tag
I removed the spam tag as the article contains some negative statements about the product as well. The article reflects what the sources say about the product. I'm sympathetic to the tagger's concerns but would ask the tagger to make specific changes to improve the article as I'm not sure how to satisfy the objection myself. Thanks! - House of Scandal (talk) 20:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Firt of all, the tag is an advert tag, not a spam tag. And I've put it back in, as the article still reads like an advert. What's the point of having the opinions of one (1!) customer about the product? Or to have have "someone" claiming it's "a rare treasure"? That it's made from "rare, translucent" beans? Almost everything in the article is written in the same style, using highly subjective terms instead of the neutrality that could be expected from an encyclopedic article. JdeJ (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Image
The image does not depict Porcelana bars. It shows a '9' bar, a Chuao bar, an 'I Cru' and a La Tavoletta box. Not a Porcelana bar among them. I happen to have one handy here, and will take a picture and post it as soon as I find the time. Radioflux (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Image is now updated. Radioflux (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)