Talk:Amejo

Categories for "Race" and "Sexual Fetishism"
I placed two categories for "Race" (since this interest is racial) and for "Sexual fetishism" (since some of these relationships are obviously sexual), and they were specifically removed by user: TakuyaMurata. Edit

Rather than get into an edit war, I would like to get the reason it is felt they are not appropriate...--Joel Lindley (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * For the record, I didn't remove the categories. But I agree with the removal because putting such categories might not be NPOV. -- Taku (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand. Since the article is new, I guess we'll just see how it goes from there.--Joel Lindley (talk) 19:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * This terms seems either made up or not widely used. I think this makes it problematic for inclusion here. Is there a Wikipedia Japan page with this term? If not, this term is bs. --Soda80 (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * How is the term "BS" if there are reputable sources for the terms?--Joel Lindley (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

merge article
two terms which deserve no article YVNP (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, this isn't a forum on our personal opinions on terms or articles; but, whether or not it fits Wikipedia. If you feel you can add to it, do so.--Joel Lindley (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Please confirm classification
The WikiProject classification for Amejo is. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)