Talk:Amelia Greenhall

review
Amelia Greenhall does not seem to meet the criteria for a Notable Person per the Wikipedia guidelines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)

Greenhall does not meet the basic criteria nor additional criteria: Basic criteria[edit]

See also: Wikipedia:General notability guideline Shortcut: WP:BASIC People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[3] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[4] and independent of the subject.[5]

If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[6] Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event, or such as those listed in What Wikipedia is not.

Additional criteria[edit] People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.

A person who fails to meet these additional criteria may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability. Editors may find these criteria helpful when deciding whether to tag an article as requiring additional citations (using for example), or to instead initiate a deletion discussion.

Any biography[edit] Shortcut: WP:ANYBIO The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.[7] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.77.53.102 (talk • contribs) John Nagle (talk) 07:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)