Talk:America's Son

A separate article is not needed here
All of the information contained here is in the article on the band. This article is pointless. --Michig (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

There are two issues here; First is the album notable, and second is there enough encyclopedic content for a standalone article. The claim to notability is a #36 placing in the Billboard Heatseekers Chart. Per the notability guidelines, a placing in the national chart, i.e. the Billboard 200, would indicate likely notability. The Heatseekers chart is only for artists that have not had a top-100 album in the Billboard 200. Number 36 on this chart represents an incredibly low national chart placing. It doesn't make the album notable. On the issue of content, all of the content here is already in the No Justice article and there don't appear to be sources available to expand the article beyond what is there. There is therefore no justification for a standalone article. I would rather not waste the time of half a dozen editors by taking this to AfD if possible, when there is only likely to be one outcome. --Michig (talk) 17:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Reply -
 * 1) WP:TOOSHORT.
 * 2) Why exactly is 2nd Avenue long enough for its own article outside of No Justice, and why is it notable?--Jax 0677 (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:TOOSHORT is irrelevant. The issue here is that this is just duplicated information. Should further coverage emerge in the future that would allow the article to be expanded that would be the time to have a separate article. 2nd Avenue could also be merged, though that article's status has no bearing on this one. --Michig (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree with Michig. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Reply - So why wasn't 2nd Avenue made part of the AfD, nor part of this discussion?--Jax 0677 (talk) 04:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)