Talk:American Century

Not only a US term
I reverted an edit that the "American Century is only a US term because the term American century ''is' known outside the US. Googling "American Century" and restricting to .uk, .fr, .de (that is, United Kingdom, French, and German) domains gives 26100, 707, and 12000 hits, respectively. The BBC, a UK news service, did a program known as the "American Century," in which it makes the claim that "The Twentieth Century was undoubtedly the American century" . &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 10:09, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

See also Talk:20th century. &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 12:02, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

Chinese Century?
We have an Indian Century article, and business magazines frequently mention a "Chinese Century", shouldn't such an article exist?


 * Chinese Century/Asian Century/Indian Century


 * Maybe. Write one! Greyfedora 00:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on American Century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140629045949/http://www3.wooster.edu/History/jgates/book-ch3.html to http://www3.wooster.edu/History/jgates/book-ch3.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507211238/http://www.sss.gov/induct.htm to http://www.sss.gov/induct.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090625085003/http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=486 to http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?researchid=486

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Trump and the American Century
The page mentions an article blaming Trump for the end of the American Century, isn't such an article very biased to be placed on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.98.163.135 (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Agreed 100%, don't take it seriously since it's common in Wokepedia. 177.38.210.52 (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia should strive to debunk the Chinese century idea actively, we have population pyramids and we can see a China in decline
I am fucking sure someone has written on this.