Talk:American Indian Hispanic and Latino Americans

Why was this article created in the first place?
Just so it could be filled (such as it was) with OR? Should probably be redirected to Hispanic and Latino Americans. Why create a subarticle when there's so little info about this group in the parent article in the first place?! Makes no sense. SamEV (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I just found out about this article right now. I am confused about it. Is it talking about Native Americans in the Southwestern United States who were Hispanicized during Spanish/Mexican rule, or are they talking about Latin American Natives living in the United States (like the Quechuas). This looks like original research, like Asian Hispanic and Latino Americans. Lehoiberri (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's supposed to be about Hispanics and Latinos who identify as "American Indian or Alaska Native" or vice versa (American Indians and Alaska Natives who indicate that they are Hispanic or Latino). It's analogous to White Hispanic and Latino Americans. It used to be chock-full of OR, but I removed it all.
 * But in light of that, I do find the pictures of the Apache leaders baffling. Anachronous. Did they identify as Hispanics or Latinos, or Spanish, or anything that could justify their inclusion here? That strikes me, too as OR. Do you agree then that they should be removed? SamEV (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. I have no promblem of removing it. SamEV, what is your opinion on Asian Hispanic and Latino Americans? It's OR, it is a clone of White Hispanic and Latino Americans. In my opinion, I think either the article can be removed, or merged to Asian Latin American. Lehoiberri (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll remove those images, then. I wanted a second opinion first, because the creator and I just don't get along and I'm sure he'll claim I'm out to get him.
 * About Asian H/L Ams, I don't know. First, I'll finally edit it — been meaning to since a few months ago, when I came across it and noticed the OR, too. I think it'll end up looking very much like this article. We'll see. SamEV (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)