Talk:American Law Reports

Organization leading to possible bias:
The paragraph:
 * Although similar in tone to the articles in legal encyclopedias, ALR annotations are different in that they are not organized alphabetically, and they tend to delve more deeply into a specific legal principle or doctrine, while, in contrast, encyclopedia articles aim for a broader view of the legal issue. In addition, ALR articles are careful to provide cases on both sides of the legal issue and provide listings of cases according to their jurisdiction.

(emphasis supplied). The emphasized phrase being embedded among points of contrast between ALR and legal encyclopedias leads to the suggestion that that same phrase is itself a point of contrast, and therefore implies that legal encyclopedias generally do not provide cases on both sides of a legal issue. I'm not so sure that's true in my experience, and either way, is the exact sort of statement that should be sourced. I'd say as an aside, this article does read a bit like an ad for ALR. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 09:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on American Law Reports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007171745/http://west.thomson.com:80/documentation/westlaw/wlawdoc/lawstu/lssecd06.pdf to http://west.thomson.com/documentation/westlaw/wlawdoc/lawstu/lssecd06.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC)