Talk:Amiga E

Talk:Programming_language -- Are we no longer going to fix the names of these articles? As far as I know everyone was agreed that languages should be titles nnnn programming language. Much conversation has gone on about this for a very long time and I have not seen anyone disagree. 99.9% of articles follow this naming convention already. My understanding was that the only reason that those articles were not being moved was that nobody was up to it. I just took the inititive. Sorry. Rlee0001 22:17 Oct 20, 2002 (UTC)

Untitled

 * There seems to be a misunderstanding. See your talk page. --mav

To-do list

 * Add citation that the Amiga E was a popular language; currently we only cite the language creator.
 * Should the article title be "Amiga E (programming language)"?
 * When the maintenance template should be removed?
 * Overview should be expanded and/or Syntax block should be added; see: C (programming language) - Overview

CC: @Polluks @Pavlor Kajsa Gauza (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Myself, I would remove all parts referenced by primary sources (Aminet etc.) and rewrite the article by using reliable sources (some are already in the article, eg. French AmigaNews). However, my personal to-do list is long and my Wiki time too short, so I can't do it myself in a reasonable time frame. What I can do is to list more reliable sources here on the talk page. Pavlor (talk) 06:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I would appreciate that. Kajsa Gauza (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)