Talk:Amiral Baudin-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 06:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

I will post a review here shortly. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Initial comments: G'day, Nate, I hope you and your family are well at this time. Nice work on this article; looks pretty good overall. I have a few minor comments/suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * "File:Warship, Algiers, Algeria-LCCN2001697826.jpg" --> suggest cropping the border
 * Done
 * the following terms appear to be overlinked: Watertight compartment, centerline (nautical), broadside
 * Fixed
 * there are no dab links (no action required)
 * external links all work (no action required)
 * were significnatly more --> typo
 * Fixed
 * As a results of the alterations --> typo
 * Good catch
 * Hoche as a successor is mentioned in the infobox, but I wonder if it should be mentioned in the body of the article
 * Worked it in where it talks about the Marceaus
 * The Amiral Baudin's were the first French capital ships --> not sure about the apostrophe here
 * Good catch - not sure how that made its way in there ;)
 * A modified version of the 76-ton gun with a longer barrel and that had been --> "and" is probably redundant here
 * Removed
 * the infobox says that the torpedo tubes were 450 mm, but the text seems to indicate that they 381 mm
 * Fixed
 * sea floor but was did not become stuck --> typo
 * Whoops
 * in the References, suggest translating the title of the Masson work
 * Added
 * in the References, is there an OCLC or similar for the Masson work?
 * Added
 * images look correctly licenced to me (no action required)
 * information appears appropriately referenced (no action required)
 * Thanks AR. Parsecboy (talk) 11:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Well written: ✅
 * a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
 * b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research: ✅


 * a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
 * c. it contains no original research; and
 * d. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

3. Broad in its coverage: ✅


 * a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
 * b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. ✅

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute ✅

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: ✅


 * a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
 * b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.