Talk:Amoebiasis

Orphaned references in Amoebiasis
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Amoebiasis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Sherris": From Trichomonas vaginalis:  From Serology:  From Pneumocystis pneumonia:  From Toxoplasmosis:  From Entamoeba histolytica:  From Toxoplasma gondii:  From Infectious disease: Kenneth J. Ryan and C. George Ray, Sherris Medical Microbiology Fourth Edition McGraw Hill 2004.  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

These are all formatting variants of references to the same book. However some include page numbers for specific information, one of the problems with citing large reference works. Entamoeba (talk) 13:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Article Assessment for WikiProject Medicine
Hello. I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reviewed of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below: Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Assess article with class and importance factors
 * I like the work here, keep it up :)

Image


EME44 (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed merger
The term Entamoebiasis is synonymous with Amoebiasis, and the former article reads more like an entry from Wiktionary than something you would expect here. Enix150 (talk) 18:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

I have no problem with them being merged as long as anyone searching for Entamoebiasis or Entamebiasis is automatically forwarded to Amoebiasis. The history is that someone moved everything under Entamebiasis a couple of years back and this was the compromise. Entamoeba (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I have completed the merge. The page Entamebiasis now redirects here. LT90001 (talk) 13:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amoebiasis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rifki/arc414/Water%20and%20Waste/WaterWaste_09.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070813215619/http://www.eurosurveillance.org/em/v04n10/0410-222.asp to http://www.eurosurveillance.org/em/v04n10/0410-222.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Changes

 * Not sure why this bit was removed "but may not reliably exclude infection"?


 * "unless proven to be E. histolytica" implies treatment of E histolytica is always needed. Not supported by the source.
 * Amoebiasis is not just E histolytica

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)