Talk:Amory Street station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 14:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Grabbing this for review. I expect my first comments to be up within 24 hours. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Now to begin.....

Infobox

 * With nothing found that suggests otherwise, I fully believe File:Inbound train at Amory Street station, December 2021.JPG is indeed something you took yourself.
 * Maybe it's just too soon for this when the station just opened a couple months ago, but are any ridership stats available for Amory?
 * Not for the new station, but I added stats for the two predecessor stations.
 * Change the "15th" from "November 15th, 2021" into simply "15" per MOS:DATE

Lead

 * Flawless!

Station layout

 * No problems!

I don't quite have time to assess the rest just yet, but similar to Babcock Street station, it would help to give the first half of "History" its own subsection, whether "Streetcar service" or something else gets used. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Streetcar service

 * Nothing wrong with File:MBTA 3176 at St Paul Street, September 1965.jpg
 * Spell out Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and Boston University College of Fine Arts in full for their first mentions
 * We've got a dead link with ref#12 ("Closeup: Rhett Check"), and the archived version doesn't offer anything to support the bits on Andy Bell or Arts on the Line.
 * ✅ Link fixed and reworded.
 * ✅ Link fixed and reworded.

Stop consolidation

 * No evidence that File:Inbound train at BU West station, December 2018.JPG isn't another work of yours, so that's perfectly acceptable to use
 * Change the hyphens from "consolidate four stops - Boston University West, St. Paul Street, Pleasant Street, and Babcock Street - located near Boston University's West Campus" into longer dashes per WP:DASH.
 * Any Bell and his creations are nowhere to be found here
 * There's a couple paragraphs and a photo (that shows Bell's signature) about halfway down the article.
 * There's a couple paragraphs and a photo (that shows Bell's signature) about halfway down the article.

Overall

 * Prose: Almost there, just needs a bit of fine-tuning
 * Referencing: One problematic link that isn't formatted correctly, and some text needs other citations to corroborate it
 * Coverage: Sufficiently broad without excess details
 * Neutrality: No issues with bias
 * Stability: Looks good
 * Media: The three images found are relevant and free of copyright
 * Verdict: Starting now, I'm putting this on hold for seven days. Thankfully there aren't many issues with the article. SNUGGUMS (talk / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 00:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! I think I've addressed everything. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Of course, and my bad on missing Bell's signature for a piece of art. Happy to now pass after making a minor adjustment for consistent formatting. <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 01:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)