Talk:Amy Walker

Speedy deletion nomination of Amy Walker


A tag has been placed on Amy Walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Kingofthesalads (talk) 09:34, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

This article should not be speedy deleted because...
This article should not be speedy deleted because Amy Walker has been covered repeatedly in the media, including television, the radio, and print media. Some of her media citations are given in the footnotes to the article. Amy Walker's website also lists some of her media citations: . There has been more than enough independent coverage to make her notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.194.146 (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

This article should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --50.105.0.145 (talk) 23:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Because the subject is the most interesting of any of your sites that I have read in months. This woman is not just a gifted mimic; her ability rises to the level of the greatest analysts of contemporary linguistics and social customs. Indeed, it is because her talents are unique, genuinely one-of-a-kind, that whoever wrote the article has not yet succeeded in explaining why she deserves inclusion. A regular, old style, book-encyclopedia, would include her without hesitation or remorse. I say that as someone who has written old-style, invited author, encyclopedia articles. The thing you should be doing with this article is figuring out how to explain what is so special about this woman's skill in penetrating accents and vocal habits. Sincerely: Albert Harris, Professor UNC


 * Hmmm, carrying a torch much?137.205.183.31 (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Walker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.bwcitypaper.com/Articles-i-2008-05-01-218680.112112_Speaking_in_Tongues.html/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100918054032/http://blogs.southwhidbeyrecord.com/spindthriftpages/amy-walker-returns-show/126/ to http://blogs.southwhidbeyrecord.com/spindthriftpages/amy-walker-returns-show/126/
 * Added tag to http://blogs.southwhidbeyrecord.com/spindthriftpages/amy-walker-live/178/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Notability and content
The article reads like a puff piece from the actor themselves or their agent. I would also suggest a minor actress with no major films, tv, or theatre to her record isn't really notable enough to meet Wikipedia's standards.