Talk:Amy Winehouse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Chase  ( talk ) 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

First of all, User:FD, when nominating a GAN, please place at the top of the article's talk page.

With that being said, I will have to quick-fail this article per criterion 3 at WP:RGA: "There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including, , , or large numbers of , , or similar tags. "  was the first thing I saw upon looking at the article, and just by scanning the table of contents, I'm not surprised. I think User:Robofish said it best here. The majority of this is about Winehouse's personal life, which is totally unacceptable for a musician article. – Chase  ( talk ) 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, this review may have made it seem as if I only scanned the TOC, but I did indeed look through the article, though briefly as the undue weight towards Winehouse's personal life and controversies was rather obvious. – Chase  ( talk ) 22:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)