Talk:Amy Wyatt/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 07:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Started the reviewing process. ASHUIND  07:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Final Analysis

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Not much concerns here. ASHUIND  07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHUIND  07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All such aspects have been covered.ASHUIND  07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Fine here. ASHUIND  07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. <b style="color:orange;">ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: