Talk:An Unforgettable Summer/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JZCL (talk · contribs) 20:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I will review within a week. JZCL 20:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Good article criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria    A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Initial comments

 * Good inline citations
 * No cast list?!?!?
 * Couple of minor issues - explained below

Review
 <li>:</li>


 * ❌ The title of the film is in italics in references (An Unforgettable Summer and Un été inoubliable). Books should not be in italics. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>


 * ❌ It did not go to box office, and the budget is unknown. Not mixing the sections together, or else it would be even shorter. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

<li>.</li> <li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

===Comments===
 * 1) Divide the plot production section into additional subsections; suggested headings above.
 * I have never seen a plot split into subsections, not even in any FAs. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Still ❌. This would make the sections to be made up of short paragraphs, which looks horrible. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Fix dead URLs from link above.
 * ✅ Changed one. ❌ I will not change the other, because it needs membership to be viewed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Needs section for cast list.
 * ❌ Not required by GA criteria, and it also looks messy and lists ruin articles (in my opinion). Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Add additional details in infobox such as budget and box office.
 * ❌ Both of these are unknown. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Probably best to have more than one or two references for the longer paragraphs unless the reference really does have all of the information of the paragraph.
 * ❌. Which it does. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

These are the 5 most important things to deal with in my opinion; I'm putting this article on hold. Feel free to disagree with anything I've put. JZCL 13:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Ahh, sorry antique - I meant that the production section should be split into additional sections, not the plot - it just seemed a bit short. See in the table for the subsections I recommended. As for cast list - if you really don't want to, you don't have to; I just thought that it would be easier for someone to access the details. As for the budget, I couldn't find that either (sorry) but you can find the box office here. As for the last point, you're probably right. The place that I was referring to was the last paragraph of the plot section, which doesn't really need inline citations at all (though great that you've got them).
 * Might have to resort to some of the more minor points:


 * Make sure that the citations always go in ascending order.
 * ✅ Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Disambiguate Before the Rain in the first paragraph of impact and legacy.
 * ✅ Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Are there any usable images of the film itself? It's fine if there aren't, but it might be nice.
 * Can't find any, and if they were, they would be under copyright. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Would it good to have a subsection on critical reception in the impact and legacy section?
 * ❌, and it fits nicely the way it is. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * If you can find it, the music list would be good.
 * ❌ Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Rating available? (PG etc.)
 * ❌ Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry I gave you a few bad first comments - hopefully not too much criticism can be found here. JZCL 20:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I think that this would be OK to pass now. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Well done. JZCL 19:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Result: Pass by JZCL 19:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC).