Talk:Anatomically correct doll

paragraph from Day care sex abuse hysteria
I copied a paragraph on the controversy of the use of anatomically correct dolls in questioning children from the Day care sex abuse hysteria article, specifically this version:. I have not myself verified the accuracy of the text against the original source used. Siawase (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

This article really requires a picture! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.165.220.64 (talk) 23:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Sendak
That doll in the lower picture looks awfully Maurice Sendak-esque. Is it supposed to be one of his characters? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 04:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Apparently it's Max from Where The Wild Things Are. Oddly, he never appears naked in the book (even though other Sendak characters did in their respective books). FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Wrong illustrative photo
This toy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anatomically_Correct_Max_(8861899243).jpg [which was used until FEB 2019] is NOT representative.

The doll is still symbolic, as the lips, brows etc. are not anatomically correct.

-》 Let us replace it or change the description to "pseudocorrect"

Also: do the therapists cum investigators really use such suggestive "half-true" props?

Zezen (talk) 07:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It's clearly a novelty item from Where the Wild Things Are. This represents a fundamental problem with the scope of the article: Do any of the reliable sources put children's potty-training dolls, dolls used for therapy, sex dolls and "reborn babies" in the same category? –dlthewave ☎ 13:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Update: Thank you, the editors who updated this doll pic here as per my suggestion above! Zezen (talk) 12:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and removed Winking Christina as there is no indication that this represents an educational doll. –dlthewave ☎ 12:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * After seeing this, I also questioned use of that image (whether it's authentic). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Scope
I propose limiting the scope of this article to children's educational dolls. This could include sex-ed dolls, or be limited to those used in sexual abuse investigation/therapy applications. Few sources discuss the dolls themselves in detail, so it may be better to focus on how they are used and their questionable effectiveness. Here are a few Google Books results:   –dlthewave ☎ 17:57, 9 February 2019 (UTC)