Talk:Anca Heltne

Content challenged: Add citation or remove
has been challenged and will be removed unless a direct citation supporting it is added. —  JJJ  (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please ready this sources in norwegian, they have been married since 2001 https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runar_Heltne https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anca_Heltne http://www.aftenposten.no/100Sport/ol/Klarte-OL-kravet---kan-bli-vraket-330400.snd#.U1ATQhKrtoE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leventebest (talk • contribs) 17:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop the edit war
User:R0745976409 please stop undoing the revisions made by User:Pietaster. The content you are removing is sourced and should stay. If you do not agree, please discuss on the talk page here. -- Kndimov (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Please leave this profile as it is now, because this case is confidential until the case will have an final decision from the TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS)in Lausanne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leventebest (talk • contribs) 08:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Even if so, there is no justification to remove the part about the ban from 2010 to 2012: significant information quoting a reliable source Noyster  (talk),  15:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Please leave this article as it is now, because she won her case against ANAD (Romanian Anti Doping Agency) at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS) in Lausanne March 2013 because ANAD made failure in the test procedure. Since she is now pregnant with her second child she have also announced official her retirement at the age of 36, after 20 years of sport at a world class level. I hope it is the last time I need to edit this article after you but it back again as before, SO PLEASE LEAVE IT AS IT IS NOW!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leventebest (talk • contribs) 09:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Could you provide a source proving that she won her appeal? This really seems unlikely; if it was true she wouldn't be facing a life ban now, as is reported in all sources. — Pietaster (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please leave this article as it is now, because she won her case against ANAD (Romanian Anti Doping Agency) at TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS) in Lausanne March 2013 because ANAD made failure in the test procedure. CAS 2013/A/3243 FRA v ANAD. www.tas-cas.org. I hope you understand and this was the last time I edit this article again with a valid explanation. Please respect this person so people can read the true, and not information what seams to not be as the thought it was. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leventebest (talk • contribs) 17:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * In the current list of IAAF sanctions it says the doping positive from February 2014 is her second anti-doping rule violation ("2nd ADRV"). If she had actually won a CAS hearing over the case IAAF wouldn't have reason to state that, or to ban her for eight years. Your claim seems to be a blatant lie, or the CAS hearing in 2013 was about yet another doping positive, presumably from after she came back in 2012. --178.232.197.37 (talk) 13:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There are no 2013 decisions on that site. -- Neil N  talk to me  17:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There are sufficient reliable sources for all the information in the article now. Pending CAS cases have no relevance on content here. The doping cases are public knowledge and are not in breach of any legal body relevant to wikipedia. SFB 20:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the cleanup SFB. I think "She has been in a world class level in shot put for almost 20 years..." has no adequate sources. Thoughts? -- Neil N  talk to me  21:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If you're taking into account age category competitions, then that is a fair assessment. At senior level its more debatable (she threw 16.42m in 1996), but I'm inclined to let it stand. SFB 22:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)