Talk:Ancestry of the Godwins/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 11:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Only one quibble: the OED hyphenates "throne-worthy", and as the article meets all the GA criteria, in my view:

GA review summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

I gave this a first read-through yesterday evening, and rather flagged at the array of confusable names, but returning in the light of day I find all is crystal clear, with all the tangled skeins beautifully unpicked. A fine achievement. –  Tim riley  talk    11:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)