Talk:And the Rest Is Drag/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 18:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Quoting this daily from now on. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking time to review! Happy to address any concerns --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Well-written
A pleasant read with a lot of personality! Some nit-picks:
 * her relationship with her father and his death — "her relationship with [...] his death" is a bit odd, perhaps: "with her late father", or, later on: "and her feelings about his death".
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * vaguely shares — perhaps something like, "alludes", to remove any possible negative connotation.
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * (featuring Clairy Browne) — this would seem useful on the song's first mention, unless I am missing something.
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Violet Chachki says her look — I initially thought she was referencing Davenport's outfit.
 * Added "own". --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Verifiable with no original research
A lot of good sources! Looking at the ones of unknown reliability, their about pages, publishers, and what they cite, seem satisfactory. This is a bit silly from WERRRK.com, but yes, they were selected for archive by the Library of Congress, and WP:PLOTCITE also partially applies.
 * Compounded with the blockquote, I sense a bit of over-quoting in the "Reception" section. They're part of every sentence! Of course, it shouldn't be too difficult to make some tweaks and work your magic.
 * I've done a bit of paraphrasing and also moved the commentary re: fashion by The Guardian to the fashion paragraph under "Production and fashion". --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Gambit Magazine may not be needed as a self-described blog.
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Spot-check

 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * I'll be lenient towards the "guest judge" and "special guest", but perhaps find a ref for the Emmy, as it's outside the Drag Race franchise. Looks good otherwise.
 * Looks good alongside the other ref.
 * Looks good
 * Looks good
 * I'll be lenient towards the "guest judge" and "special guest", but perhaps find a ref for the Emmy, as it's outside the Drag Race franchise. Looks good otherwise.
 * Looks good alongside the other ref.
 * Looks good
 * Looks good alongside the other ref.
 * Looks good
 * Looks good

Broad in its coverage
Many hits on Google Scholar and TWL, but upon checking, none of them discuss the episode in any detail, it just seems to be a catchy tagline. Looking through news articles and websites, I can safely say that this article is quite broad.
 * I agree that it's an overall benefit, but the 110 words of background on Cameron is a bit distracting. Perhaps the list of episodes could be summarized.
 * I've trimmed a bit. I had hoped to include the relevant episode titles, but perhaps that's too much detail? I should note two of the episodes are later mentioned re: Cayne. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I think it looks better, but silly me, sorry for not catching this! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Could you clarify The Guardian stance on Pearl's and Chachki's outfits? It seems to be positive considering statements like: "...give people a reason to root for you other than the fact that [you wear] corsets tighter than Miss Scarlett herself", and "...so I, like Michelle Visage, applaud [...] all efforts to channel Madonna (now two weeks running!)." Whatever you think works best!
 * Also, to segue from their shady first statement about Chachki, would any of their commentary on the contestants' personas, relationships, or exit interviews be worth a mention? Some of it isn't too tied to the episode as a whole, but I'd be interested in your opinion.
 * I would say this seems like unnecessary detail. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That's fair: it's tricky, because they never really make it about the episode as a whole.

Neutral
Neutral as can be, seemingly no issues.
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Stable
One revert over due weight and a recent AFD with rough consensus to keep; no major, outstanding issues.

Illustrated
Images are CC licensed from Flickr, own works, VRT confirmed, or public domain. They are quite lovely, I like the Madonna and Sally Bowles pictures for reference. However:
 * Consider filling out the "non replacable" paramater in the infobox image.
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Summary
Some starters for now; my other thoughts may be more extensive. Thank you for your continued patience! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * No problem! Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I've tried to address your concerns. You'll notice I just created a subsection for Fashion under Production, to follow-up on some of my above comments. Please let me know if any concerns remain. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I like the sectioning! One teeny source thing. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Averageuntitleduser Thanks! I've added a citation by the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Lovely work! Thanks for sticking with me, I'm now happy to pass this article! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for reviewing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)