Talk:André Laug

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it relies on objective sources. Many of facts described are from decades ago, and it is a well-stablished firm.

I try to help the author, she is a newbie and the format of the sources was imported from itwiki. I fixed that.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * i did something else but I live in China so I go to bed. I hope I can help tomorrow as well.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Jonesey95 thank you for removing speedy deletion tag. I've spoken with User: Lena Villa Santa in her talk, she is doing her best to improve the quality and if you have any advice about the writing, you're welcome to share as well.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Mabalu do you think that the Copy edit tag could be removed now. The quality has been improved, I guess a simple revision from a en-N user could be enough to fix that aspect.--Alexmar983 (talk) 03:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Alexmar983 - The article still needs a lot of editing as a lot still reads like it was written by someone for whom English is not their first language, so copy editing is still required although the article is certainly improved a bit. Mabalu (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ops my fault Mabalu, I was not thinking in facts to the Copy edit tag (I put that tag, if I remember correctly), I wanted to discuss about the "advertisement" tag. I still don't think the style is promotional, the article contains the type of information you need to read about the story of a fashion brand. I believe that a revision from an anglophone could fix this aspect quickly.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You've done a good job removing the worst of the marketing from the article, thanks. I've made some further edits for WP:NPOV, and removed the tag. I've also fixed the remaining copyedit issues. OnionRing (talk) 07:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Good, OnionRing. I spoke with the newbiee, she said that as soon she is back home she will find other sources. We have a "long" way ahead, but I hope it will improve even more.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Living in China, I have no access to google books, otherwise i would have already improved the existing sources. i think we should move the personal website to the external link section, cutting the parts in the test sourced with it.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)